Ethical dimensions in the health professions

Book – Purtilo, R. B., & Doherty, R. F. (2016). Ethical dimensions in the health professions (Sixth edition.). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
In this unit, you will explore the differences between morality and ethics by examining a scenario and its implications from varying perspectives. By the end of this unit, you will be able to proficiently discuss the need for and role of ethics in the American healthcare environment.
To begin, select one (1) of the following stories from your textbook from which to address the assignment requirements:
The Story of the Harvey Family and the Interprofessional Care Team (p. 3)
The Story of Pat Jackson, the Interprofessional Care Team, and Mr. Sanchez (p. 29)
The Story of Bill Boyd and Kate Lindy (p. 53)
The Story of Elizabeth Kim, Max Diaz, Melinda Diaz, and Michael Meary (p. 73)
The Story of Michael Halloran and Amrou Croteau (p. 106)
In a 3-5 page paper (excluding title page and reference list), address the following:
Summarize the story briefly providing the ethical dilemma and parties involved.
Discuss the varying perspectives from the parties involved. Be sure to discuss potential reasoning for the varied perspectives. Please note that you may need to include fictitious information to complete this.
Discuss ethical standards relevant to the unique scenario.
Identify possible personal moral convictions which may influence the direction of the story.
Foreshadow potential events in the story of what could happen if ethical standards did not exist.
ANSWER
Introduction
Ethics defines the moral principles of an individual that takes control and govern the behavior when carrying out an activity. Ethics is an important parameter that is used in determining what is good for people in a society. This act is necessary in satisfaction of human needs such as being honest and fair to other people, it helps people to judge what is right and wrong through the type of decisions made in a case. It is therefore important for people to embrace this aspect which is essential in providing logic and practical guide to people in their lives.
Summary of the story and ethical dilemma
An ethical dilemma refers to the situation where a difficult choice of the solution has to be considered between two action courses which may have a moral principle (Markham & Buchanan, 2012). In the story, Drew Harvey is identified to be the main character who is a son to Alice and Harvey. He is a popular student who studies at Mount More College. Drew is a talented guy in games and he happens to be a captain in the college basketball team and as well had organized his own band that went to play every Saturday night at Mole Hole pub. Drew worked as an assistant physical therapist that treated members in the local football team during the period of summer training (Doherty & Purtilo, 2015). He announced that he was going to become a physical therapist when he went back in his junior year. The violence that happened within the university lead to its closure and this forced the basket team play at Mole Hole an event set aside for graduate students together with their friends. Drew got shot during this game at the end of the first set and this made him lose her consciousness and therefore immediately taken to hospital.
Drew undergoes surgery to remove the bullet and later regained his consciousness after lasting for 2 weeks in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Drew’s condition went on stabilizing where the physician informed Alice, Drew’s mother that he would soon be allowed to get home and here a dilemma is observed as Alice did not agree with this since Grew could not even, walk, talk and found it difficult to manage him at home. Finally, Drew is taken home and offered home healthcare agency since the school insurance did not cover inpatient rehabilitation. Drew’s brother comes home to check on him and at least relieve his mother to move out for some time without worry about Drew’s condition. Drew faces some challenges with treatment discontinuation until acute symptoms are observed.
Varying perspective and ethical standards
Social injustice perspectives have been identified in the case story where the greatest part lies in Drew’s treatment and handling. The physicians in the hospital where pull out Drew and sends him out for a home healthcare agency only because the student insurance does not cover inpatient rehabilitation. Drew is therefore sent home beside his weaknesses of the body and also he was not in a position to walk or talk. He is also discontinued from treatment services until the patience symptoms become acute again for treatment to be reinstituted.
Ethical standards refer to kind of principles that when followed can impact the promotion of good values such as trust, kindness, fairness and good behavior (Vayena & Tasioulas, 2013). For instance, projecting to the case scenario, the physicians in the hospital need to ensure the ethical standards by providing the appropriate treatment and healthcare to Drew regardless of the limits that are accounted for. These standards include justice and fairness in institution treatment and home healthcare services to Drew.
Personal Morale Conviction and foreshadow of events in the story
The moral conviction about the story projects a sense of wrong decisions made at some point concerning Drew hospitality. This is because it is not the right decision to turn against a person when in a caught up situation. Drew gets the shop in a basketball competition and he is taken to hospital for the operation. He stays in an unconscious situation in ICU for 2 weeks and after the physicians discover his state of slight discovery, he is sent home and attached to a home healthcare agency which is seen not to work well (Doherty & Purtilo, 2015). His treatment is also terminated until when symptoms of becoming acute again for treatment to be reinstituted.
Some of the foreshadowed events when ethical standards are not met or do not exist include misconduct and poor performance in the provision of services. In our case story, lack of fairness by the physicians can result in poor treatment service. The situation can also result to the poor performance of Drew in his recovery process as the treatment interruption can result to missing of some important service in medication thereby leading to the worse situation and need for more attention to the patient.
Conclusion
Ethics are used as the guiding principle in making decisions. Negative ethics impacts to poor services and therefore negative results. Ethical standards are important aspects of healthcare and medical care as well. They are useful in promoting necessary moral values such as social responsibility, patient’s welfare and human rights protection. In relation to the case story, various ethical dilemmas have been observed between Drew, his parents and the physician in the hospital and the decisions made against each of them. Resolution of negative ethics is therefore important in promoting the wellbeing of every individual in society.
References
Doherty, R. F., & Purtilo, R. B. (2015). Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Version 2.0. recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Available online: air. org/reports/ethics2. pdf.
Vayena, E., & Tasioulas, J. (2013). Adapting standards: ethical oversight of participant-led health research. PLoS medicine, 10(3), e1001402.

Open chat
Need assignment help?