Henrietta Lacks’ tumor Report Assignment Help

View the following video and answer the questions below it.
Questions:
1.When Henrietta Lacks’ tumor was harvested and distributed, what relevant recommendations of the Belmont Report were followed or not followed?
2.Were Henrietta Lacks’ rights violated? If so, which ones? (Use the various international covenants we talked about on Monday to get some ideas for potential rights, but you are not limited to those).
3.If you were someone at Johns Hopkins today working to compensate the family today for not receiving any credit for the Lacks’ contributions, what types of compensation would you consider? (Hint: money is not the only form of compensation).
4.How would you make the decision – i.e. what stakeholders do you take into account?
ANSWER
Introduction
The use of human body cells in research has been in existence for many years. Medical studies on disease spread, effects and finding treatment methods rely on research established on the availability of body cells. The issue of vaccine development was made possible through research and analysis of internal body systems at every small bit of a living human being. Henrietta Lacks incident where her tumor cells were harvested without knowledge or permission raises the various question. The principles of the Belmont Report have been weighed in relation to the harvested and distributed cells.
Discussion
The video on Hela cells expounds the story of Henrietta Lacks a cervical cancer victim. The action of the John Hopkins doctor harvesting the lady’s tumor cells has remained a subject of discussion. According to the report on the years, the hospital kept and distributed the Hela cells from Henrietta without the family’s knowledge gives a confusing issue. In relation to the Belmont Report pertaining use of human body parts, permission from the owner was a needy action. However, the studies conducted on the cells have helped save many lives exhibiting a crucial benefit of the research. In justification of the development of the act of different medications like chemotherapy for types of cancers and even vaccines has been a success.
In violation of the ethical recommendations concerning the use of human body subjects for research, informing the patient nor the family was neglected. The acts of distributing the Hela cells have been commercialized and the family has never received any benefits from the commercial transactions. Displaying a family genetic information everywhere without consent sets an ethical question for the doctors in the name of research. The harm caused to the family after learning about their mother’s live cell in the medical lab somewhere poses injustice to a poor African-American family. The explanation by one of the sons struggling with medical covers issues explores a form of justice deed needed in some way from the John Hopkins hospital as an appreciation and respect for the helpful Hela cells from their family members.
Conclusion
The Belmont Report explains the respect, justice, and beneficiary of any human body components extracted. The case of Henrietta Lacks serves as an important research step that led to polio vaccine generation and other medical conditions understanding. Questions on ethical principles align with uninformed extraction and use of Hela cells to the extent of commercial distribution across different points without consent and family knowledge.

Open chat
Need assignment help?