what are the ways in which poverty and place are entangled?

The geographical location and resource endorsement define how the inhabitant lifestyle class is exhibited. The socio-economic factors vary from location to location explaining community life attributes and economic standards. The exploration of the question about poverty entanglement with place considers how the aspects relate with example regions exhibiting such features. The issue of poverty across nations exists as a key concern that government and non-government agents try to analyze every single year. Lack of human necessities and basic facilities affordability constraints offer special issue addressed based on location requirements. The property ownership disparity across geographical regions is implicated by political, economic and environmental issues affecting the people.
The concept of place and poverty association relies on a number of factors. Explaining the environmental, social and political elements that define the relations gets attributed through global examples on the incident. Geographical definitions and incidents that explain poverty and place entanglement consider issues like colonial indigenous homes and urban-rural areas difference.
The question about a satisfactory life has various determinant factors. The article on indigenous families in Canada describes the situation of place-poverty entanglement through property rights discussion. The policies of how legally lands and other assets get owned by indigenous people in Canada have received attention causing varying debates (Egan & Place, 2013). The property law components especially touching on Indian reserves rights has long contributed to a poor society constantly on follow up for the better description of ownership and fee on property rights. Elsewhere, the Columbia scenario still touches on a common phenomenon. Problems faced by indigenous women and children in the ongoing Columbia-British violence engage an aspect of the property, resources distribution, and recognition of bio-political cases where colonialist settlers (de Leeuw, 2016). The people are subjected to indeterminate poverty life standards as their fate continues to be discussed. Issues addressed in the journal and the incidents experienced by the Managua people in city setup depicts the factors linking poverty to place (Shillington, 2013). As the domination of socioenvironmental factors exploits the people, access to safe water, food, and other hygiene services expose a number of residents to living challenges. Simple urban agriculture in the city streets like the case of San Augusto culture of a certain metabolism and fruit tree growing to create an imbalance. Daily routines in the city space explain how people survive creating a questionable state for those that lack.
Food security exists as a major issue to consider in developing nations. The creation of Millennium Development Goals and Sustainable Development goals have been criticized for neglecting or serving inadequately in African urban setting (Battersby, 2016). Balancing the considerable measures has at times failed to create nutritional challenges for urban setting food insecurity needy people where many efforts target rural development. Elaboration on the aspects of poverty and place further is highlighted in the Flint-Michigan water crisis (Ranganathan, 2016). The location mostly inhabited by blacks experiences environmental racism issues with the inhabitants living in low-income earnings as compared to their neighborhood. Racial based property appropriations have created hot debate exploring the lead poisoning incidents as a result of poor management and the inability of the residents to afford more of the household necessities required.
The issues about land justice have dominated American urban settlement as discussed by Fransky. The poor being displaced has a close link to the racial background which then brings culture and indigenous population issues into the analysis (Safransky, 2017). The historic diagnostics explores how poverty entitlement has been misinterpreted by biased and discriminatory standards on property ownership especially land in urban centers. Chapter two discussion touching on Third World nations poverty levels explains how the definition of the term has created controversy (chapter 2, n.d.). The extensive description of the scenario faced by Latin America, Asia, and Africa brings into light how world war left many nations struggling to achieve economic prosperity again. Poor policies, mismanagement of available resources and inadequate land for Agriculture continue to keep some nations behind up to date. The topic discussion on poverty and its link to place is also explained in the case of Toronto’s Regent Park. The author talks over the significance of concentrated poverty by highlighting how the people persevere together a neglected region. The explanation about the state of the territory expounds on stigmatization issues that the residents have to share the only few resources which do not adequately support their needs (August, 2014). As a regional bottleneck, the place endures poverty that has resulted from social issues were as a cleared slum the people learned to persevere together. Neglect from the housing authority explains the stigma the people live with until now the place is being demolished for mixed redevelopment.
The different examples explain how environmental factors and poverty extend relates. The discovery of indigenous territories occupied by immigrants like Indians in US and survival colonialists’ experiences poverty issues as a region concentrated phenomenon. The issues of property ownership in some regions and facilities provision conflicts as injustice acts explain how poverty has been contributed based on what part of a country a community occupies. Impacts of the world war on some nations contributed to the current low living standards struggle trying to balance development and recovery mechanisms.
August, M. (2014). Challenging the Rhetoric of Stigmatization: The Benefits of Concentrated Poverty in Toronto’s Regent Park. Environment And Planning A: Economy And Space, 46(6), 1317-1333. doi: 10.1068/a45635
Battersby, J. (2016). MDGs to SDGs – new goals, same gaps: the continued absence of urban food security in the post-2015 global development agenda. African Geographical Review, 36(1), 115-129. doi: 10.1080/19376812.2016.1208769
Chapter 2. The Problematization of Poverty: The Tale of Three Worlds and Development.
De Leeuw, S. (2016). Tender grounds: Intimate visceral violence and British Columbia’s colonial geographies. Political Geography, 52, 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.11.010
Egan, B., & Place, J. (2013). Minding the gaps: Property, geography, and Indigenous peoples in Canada. Geoforum, 44, 129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.003
Ranganathan, M. (2016). Thinking with Flint: Racial Liberalism and the Roots of an American Water Tragedy. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(3), 17-33. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2016.1206583
Safransky, S. (2017). Land Justice as a Historical Diagnostic: Thinking with Detroit. Annals Of The American Association Of Geographers, 108(2), 499-512. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380
Shillington, L. (2013). Right to food, right to the city: Household urban agriculture, and socionatural metabolism in Managua, Nicaragua. Geoforum, 44, 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.02.006

Open chat
Need assignment help?